On Lesson Plans:
I’ve always been under the impression that lesson plans, in and of themselves, were horrible indicators of teacher preparation. They are, at best, cover letters that serve as faint landmarks to guide a teacher through what may have taken hours of thought and preparation. In learning from other teachers, it is the idea behind a lesson that carries the most currency, and in exchanges with teachers, only these ideas can be successfully transferred. Unfortunately within a lesson plan, the idea is peripheral, and the maintenance required to enact that idea is pulled to the foreground. In Good to Great, an executive from Abbott Laboratories states, “We recognize that planning is priceless, but plans are useless” (of course, Abbott Laboratories is one of the “great” companies discussed in the book). While I didn’t drink the Kool-Aid of Good to Great, I wholeheartedly agree with this statement - so much so that I showed it to my principal when explaining why I hadn’t turned in a lesson plan all year. Assessing the often ephemeral qualities of a teacher by means of a lesson plan is like pretending that you can pass judgment upon a student’s mathematical prowess with a Scantron. In both cases, the ability to jump through the given hoop is a plainly necessary but far from sufficient skill.